Thoughts on the 2009 Conference
This
years’ conference was very different from the 2008 one in
Halifax in many ways. First and most obvious, it was online. This
immediately made the conference worldwide and changed the nature of a
conference experience for almost everyone who attended.
Few people over the age of 45 or outside of the business world
have ever attended an online conference. Those who have attended one
wouldn’t recognize the technology we used. Business
conference use far more complex (expensive) technology. I chose the
various presentation technologies based mostly on what would be
completely free to view for the worldwide audience. With the advent of
YouTube, SlideShare, and Archive.net, this was not difficult.
The choice of technology to use for the live interviews was very easy.
Since before the 2008 conference, I’d been listening to Rick
Osmon’s weekly online radio show on BlogTalkRadio called The
Oopa Loopa Café. His deft management of that show, every
week without fail, assured me that we’d be in good hands with
the technology and that I’d have a tireless and dedicated
partner to organize this thing beginning last March.
The real heroes of this conference are those doing the research. From
the beginning, it became apparent that the 2008 conference had begun to
develop a reputation. I could tell this from the absolute seriousness
and rigor with which this years’ speakers prepared their
work. For instance, both Gunnar Thompson and Andrea di Robilant went to
the trouble and expense of making their own videos. Gunnar even broke
his into 10 minute chapters so they would fit into YouTube guidelines.
Brilliant!
The work presented was, as a whole, wonderful. The scholarship, while
mixed, was overall of a high caliber. The number of those from an
academic background was far higher this year. There were far fewer
breathless pronouncements. The audience itself was of a very high
caliber including scholars from three continents (possibly more).
Change is in the air.
In my view, there were two presentations which stood out for the
assessment and direction they provided – Dr. Benjamin B.
Olshin’s and Rick Osmon’s.
While gentle in his delivery, Benjamin was not subtle in his assessment
of the work he sees being done by amateurs in this field. Though he
never identified specific individuals, he did make it very clear that,
to ever be taken seriously, the amateurs working in diffusion must
begin to follow careful systems and practice. And, while not saying it
directly, he made it very clear (again, in my opinion) that almost all
the amateurs he’s encountered so far are not following any
practice whatsoever – ripping stones out of the ground,
providing no provenance, letting their pre-conceived conclusions guide
their research, capturing no site records, exploring no alternative
views, etc. I should point out that my own very limited practice in the
field is not spotless, either. To move forward, we must change.
Benjamin, our resident skeptic, is very optimistic that we can change
and grow into more careful researchers. And he spent a good deal of
time outlining some of what works for academia. In all, he is certain
that we amateurs (he’s careful to point out that this word
has no negative connotation) can make a tremendous and much-needed
contribution to the field.
How the change will happen
While helping to set up the Atlantic Conference 2009, Rick Osmon was
quietly preparing his paper on how to make what may be one of the most
important changes in amateur research in this field, indeed in any
amateur field. In his presentation to the Atlantic Conference, Rick
revealed his plan to enact the changes needed. He calls it C.O.P.S.
– the Coalition Of Pre-Columbian Studies, and it’s
the opening volley in what I am certain will become the guiding light
for pre-Columbian studies moving forward. At the same time, it will
become a thorn in the side of those who choose not to follow the
process.
The name itself, COPS, is a near-perfect analogy. Police officers only
come around and make our lives difficult when we’re breaking
the rules. And if you break the rules, everybody knows it because you
get a ticket, or worse. For the vast majority, cops are there to offer
help, security and friendly direction to travelers on the road.
Over the next few months, Rick will continue to build out the structure
of COPS, finish the business plan, and seek the cooperation of other
organizations like NEARA and work to make the promise of good amateur
research a success.
How the Atlantic Conference will use COPS
Even though it’s still in its formative state, I hereby state
The Atlantic Conference’s commitment to Rick’s
Coalition Of Pre-Columbian Studies and the processes he is proposing.
All work being submitted to the AC for review moving forward will be
subjected to a simple, yet rigorous check-list which will include many
criteria which will be stated by COPS very soon.
We are all COPS
COPS will be for everyone in the field - observers, students and
especially future generations. I strongly salute Rick Osmon for taking
this much-needed step and I will support it in any way possible.
The next Atlantic Conference
The next AC will be sometime in February, 2010. This is because we had
so many presenters this time that we couldn’t fit them all
into a weekend. The February event will be a one-day conference. It too
will be online, and will look and work precisely like the October
event. So those of you who had technical difficulties have a few months
to get them ironed out. I strongly recommend you tune in every Thursday
night to hear Rick’s Oopa Loopa Café and test the
technology.
The Atlantic Conference looking forward
I think just about everyone who was a part of this event felt that it
was a good way to experience the research and to conduct a conference.
-
It allows for far greater
participation. (the numbers are still being tallied but it
looks like close to 300 per day)
-
It exposes the work far
beyond North America.
-
It exposes the research to
far more than our small group to now include students, laypeople, and
other countries.
-
It cuts the cost of such
conferences to zero for participants and speakers, yet still preserves
some of the social aspects of on-site conferences.
-
It creates a permanent,
fully accessible and free resource for the spread of well-researched
alternative theories.
-
The greater exposure
increases the chances of attracting sponsors for researchers in the
future.
To that end, the Atlantic Conference will remain primarily an on-line
event. I won’t rule out that folks might someday gather in
large conference rooms to hear the live interviews and exchange
information in person with other researchers, but there will always be
a world-wide component to it.
Thanks to the Participation Groups
You went out of your ways to make this an engaging event for so many
people, and knowing there was camaraderie around the world in the
groups made even those listening in alone from their home computers
feel a part of something far greater.
Thank you all for being a part of the Atlantic Conference 2009.
It’s been an absolute joy being able to bring it to you.
Steve St. Clair
|